Wenn du magst, k?nnen wir jetzt:
-
das Ganze zu einer koh?renten Erz?hlung verdichten (z. B. 3–4 Seiten),
-
oder eine klare Vision bis 2027 formulieren (nicht utopisch, sondern konkret),
-
oder explizit einen Text für Au?enstehende schreiben: ?Worum es mir wirklich geht – und worum nicht“.
before the meeting i do not need summary maybe for the version after
You’re thanking the group for the open conversation and then outlining a realistic, politically feasible way to raise the issue you discussed—especially low-threshold access, work/solution integration, and mental health—without presenting it as a finished demand or an immediate project.
This narrative has been unlawfully taken from Royal Road. If you see it on Amazon, please report it.
-
You don’t treat the topic as a ready-made claim or a “launch-now” initiative.
-
You see it as a process to be tested, built step by step, designed to avoid political or institutional overload.
You propose a low-threshold first step such as a formal inquiry / interpellation whose goal is to establish facts rather than prescribe outcomes:
-
How is access to cantonal psychiatric basic care currently organized?
-
Where are the waiting times, responsibility gaps, exclusions?
-
What low-threshold services already exist, and who can actually reach them?
-
How are existing organizations/structures involved?
This would create a shared evidence base, without blame or premature commitments.
Only after the facts are clear, you suggest testing whether a small, time-limited, clearly scoped pilot makes sense:
-
small scale
-
limited duration
-
clear responsibilities
-
accompanied and evaluated
Important to you: not a precedent and not a special rule—rather a learning project to enable a clean political decision about whether/how to continue.
You emphasize that the approach does not need to be invented from scratch; it could pragmatically connect what already exists:
-
work or “solution” integration
-
support instead of pressure
-
use existing green/environment/common-good structures where helpful
The tone is non-ideological: practical, testable, and reviewable.
You clarify your personal stance:
-
no role confusion
-
no claim to represent others
-
no public appearance
If anything, your contribution is conceptual groundwork: structuring questions and helping think through processes—not being on a political stage.
If a clear line emerges over time, it could later be positioned within party politics—but you see that as later, not the starting point.
You hope the sketch makes the “how” more concrete without pre-deciding anything, and you’re open to further discussion—or to leaving it open if the timing isn’t right.
If you want, paste (or point me to) what you mean by “Chapter 101” (even rough / partial is fine), and I’ll do the same kind of clean English summary for that specific chapter too.
-
[09/01, 10:21] Urs-Li: ?Ein ganzes Leben? von Robert Seethaler - Audio & Podcasts - SRF [09/01, 10:24] Urs-Li: my neighbour Ted Bosshart (who read more books than anyone i know) was recommending it buttt for me books are difficult since 2013 [09/01, 12:01] Urs-Li: ich kenne Kafka viel auch Wittgenstein besser; Watten habe ich glaube mal gelesen; ich war aber nicht motiviert in Deutsch; [09/01, 14:01] Ghostwriter: Wittgenstein’s Nephew German (original): Wittgensteins Neffe English: Wittgenstein’s Nephew Italian: Il nipote di Wittgenstein: Un’amicizia [09/01, 15:27] Urs-Li: i am more familiar with the austro-british philosopher directly; wohl ein Vers?umnis meinerseits; [09/01, 15:52] Urs-Li: I read some books (we should have at the gymnasium) during military service; and I asked at a party a Germanistik student (to hit on her; which she did not get) for her list; [09/01, 15:56] Urs-Li: Ludwig Wittgenstein is not easy to read/understand and in general i would need to be payed to read books i missed [09/01, 16:09] Urs-Li: 2024 it was more about collecting content/questions I should catch up on; now it is about this inquiry with the Kantonsrat and until April the integration job attempt decision for me; [09/01, 16:21] Urs-Li: during the mental hospital visits; besides me having something to do reading my book to the semi blind aunt; no books would have helped at all; you would need understanding family and friends &or GoD and better both; and real consequences + change for the involved psychiatrists/Amts?rzte/system; [09/01, 16:36] Urs-Li: I would recommend you to study literature or something along the lines (which you probably have) now according to
Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF)
Eine brutal einfache Existenz, die sich über nahezu das ganze 20. Jahrhundert erstreckt. Robert Seethaler erz?hlt sie eindrücklich. Episodenhaft beschreibt er den schweren Lebensweg des schicksalsergebenen Andreas Egger. So plastisch und pr?zis, dass man meint, ihn Schritt für Schritt zu begleiten.
-
Kierkegaard it is about a different phase in life; you have to create/find your own work/change/purpose; Spassten Zeitalter is long over; [09/01, 16:48] Urs-Li: my favourite book (especially the first third) [09/01, 16:48] Urs-Li: LovelyBooks Leviathan (Léviathan) is a 1929 novel by American author Julien Green, written in French, that explores themes of obsession, power, and the human psyche through the story of a provincial French innkeeper and her male guests, using the biblical monster as a metaphor for a godless, oppressive atmosphere. The narrative is told from multiple perspectives, offering a detailed psychological analysis of its characters in a bleak setting, characterized by a stark, unsentimental style. [09/01, 16:48] Urs-Li: not uplifting nor pleasant thought